We use our own and third-party cookies to optimize your experience on this site, including to maintain user sessions. Without these cookies our site will not function well. If you continue browsing our site we take that to mean that you understand and accept how we use the cookies. If you wish to decline our cookies we will redirect you to Google.
Already have an account? Sign in.

 Remember Me | Forgot Your Password?

Consumers Still Waiting For FDA Definitions Of “Natural” And “Healthy” Foods

August 3, 2016: 12:00 AM EST
Food shoppers want to buy “natural” and “healthy” foods,” but there is still no way of verifying what manufacturers claim on their labels. The FDA reportedly is redefining the term “healthy” due to new scientific findings – food science is evolving rapidly –  regarding ingredients like fats. And the agency is pondering what makes a “natural food.” It’s not an easy task. Any new definition of natural has to meet standards of common sense, as well as satisfy the general public, consumer advocacy groups, food manufacturers and retailers. Though lawsuits have made food companies more cautious about using the natural and healthy claims, the words still appear on many products. Without conclusive definitions from the FDA, it remains a “buyer beware” situation for shoppers.
Neal Ungerleider, "The Epic Fight Over How To Label "Natural" Foods", Fast Company, August 03, 2016, © Mansueto Ventures, LLC
Domains
FOOD BUSINESS NEWS
Market Segments
News
Companies
Ingredients
Packaging
Policy & Regulation
Trends
Clean Food
Natural and Organic
Geographies
Worldwide
North America
United States of America
Categories
Companies, Organizations
Consumers
Legal, Legislation, Regulation, Policy
Products & Brands
Trends
Developed by Yuri Ingultsov Software Lab.